Class Eligibility

All persons in the United States who received calls from Chase between January 1, 2014 and March 22, 2016 that (a) were directed to a phone number assigned to a cellular telephone service, (b) were wrong number calls – in that the subscriber or customary user of the phone number called was different from the party that Chase was trying to reach, (c) were placed using an automatic telephone dialing system, and (d) were directed to a phone number associated with a Chase deposit account according to Chase’s records.

Estimated Amount

Varies

This is a pro rata settlement. The pool will be divided among qualified claims

Proof of Purchase

Cell #

Case Name

Michelle James, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
No. 8:15-cv-02424 (M.D. Fla.).
District Court of The Middle District of Floriday

Case Summary

Ms. James and Ms. Seniuk filed this lawsuit against Chase, alleging that Chase violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, when calling consumers on their cellular telephones, via an automatic telephone dialing system, at wrong numbers – in that that the subscriber to the phone number called was different from the party that Chase was trying to reach. Chase denies the allegations. The parties have agreed to a settlement.

Settlement Pool

$3,750,000

Deadline

03/21/2017

Contact


James v. JPMorgan Chase Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 43418
Providence, RI 02940-3418
844-225-4536

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *