Class Eligibility

“Settlement Class I”: All purchasers of Packaged Ice who purchased Packaged Ice in the United States indirectly* from The Home City Ice Company, Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc., Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and/or Arctic Glacier International, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) and/or Defendants’ subsidiaries or affiliates (including all predecessors thereof) at any time during the period from January 1, 2001 to March 6, 2008. Excluded from the Settlement Class are governmental entities and Defendants, including their parents, subsidiaries, predecessors or successors, Defendants’ co-conspirators, and the Releasees as defined in the Settlement Agreement.

“Settlement Class II”: All purchasers of Packaged Ice who purchased Packaged Ice indirectly* in Arizona, Arkansas, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and/or Wyoming from The Home City Ice Company, Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc., Reddy Ice Corporation, Arctic Glacier Income Fund, Arctic Glacier, Inc. and/or Arctic Glacier International, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) and/or Defendants’ subsidiaries or affiliates (including all predecessors thereof) at any time from January 1, 2001 to March 6, 2008. Excluded from the Settlement Class are governmental entities and Defendants, including their parents, subsidiaries, predecessors or successors, Defendants’ co-conspirators, and the Releasees as defined in the Settlement Agreement.

Estimated Amount

$12

Proof of Purchase

No

Case Name

Home City Packaged Ice Antitrust Settlement
md-01952-PDB-RSW
United States District Court For The Eastern Region of Michigan

Case Summary

Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants violated the antitrust (and other) laws by conspiring to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the price of Packaged Ice and/or allocate markets and customers. Plaintiffs also claim that, as a result of the conspiracy, they and other indirect purchasers of Packaged Ice have had to pay more for Packaged Ice than they would have paid without this illegal conduct.

Defendants deny Plaintiffs’ claims. At this time, neither side has proven their claims or defenses in Court. The Court has not decided whether Plaintiffs’ claims are correct or whether Defendants have engaged in any wrongdoing. To avoid the cost and risk of further litigation and/or trial, the Plaintiffs and Home City have negotiated this settlement of the claims for the Settlement Classes against Home City only.

Settlement Pool

$2,700,000.00

Deadline

05/17/2017

Contact


Home City Packaged Ice Settlement
CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
c/o Rust Consulting, Inc. – 3693
P.O. Box 1884
Faribault, MN 55021-1884
Email: Info@homecityicesettlement.com
Hotline: 800-589-3985

7 responses to “Home City Ice Indirect Purchaser Packaged Ice Class Action Settlement”

  1. Deborah Dills says:

    I used baby powder. Am I illegible?

    ADMIN – Hi Deborah,

    Baby powder? This is an ice settlement.

  2. Lorna Waiolama Samatua says:

    I am a ongoing customer buying packaged ice

  3. marian gatson says:

    I bought home city ice

  4. William Jones says:

    I have purchased the reddy brand on numerous occasions

  5. Richard Drinka says:

    As a bar owner during the period of time identified in this matter, all of my ice purchases for bar use and off sale use were made through Arctic Glacier. This amounts to thousands of dollars during this time period. Am I eligible for more than the $12? If so. how do I proceed?

    ADMIN – Hi Richard,

    No proof of purchase would be required to claim up to 12 bags/blocks of Packaged Ice. For any additional bags/blocks of Packaged Ice with proof of purchase provided, you would receive: $12 plus $2 for each additional bag/block greater than 12.

  6. brett says:

    I purchased 12 bags and would like to be eligible for $12.

    ADMIN – Hi Brett,

    How about you file a claim?

  7. Terri Benson says:

    I’ve purchased this brand for a number of years

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *