Babyganics Baby Products Class Action Settlement
Up to Full Refund
Proof of Purchase
Tanya Mayhew, et al. v. KAS Direct LLC and S.C. Johnson & Son Inc., Case No. 7:16-cv-06981, District Court for the Southern District of New York
The lawsuit alleges that the Defendants violated certain laws in marketing and sales of Babyganics Products, including the use of the terms “Babyganics” “mineral-based” and “natural.” The Settlement of this lawsuit will also resolve claims relating to subsets of Babyganics Products labeled with the terms “plant-based,” “tear-free,” and “SPF 50+”. Those claims were raised in the following cases: Machlan v. S.C. Johnson, Inc., Case No. CGC-17-557613 (Sup. Ct. CA), later removed on April 28, 2017 to the District Court of the Northern District of California, No. 3:17-cv-02442 (certain Babyganics pre-moistened wipes with “plant”-related labeling); Skeen v. KAS Direct, LLC, d/b/a/ Babyganics, No. 1:17-cv-04119 (S.D.N.Y.) (certain Babyganics products with “tear-free”-related labeling); and Carroll v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-5828, (N.D. Ill.) (certain Babyganics and mineral-based sunscreen products with SPF 50+ labeling).
The Defendants deny any and all wrongdoing of any kind whatsoever, and deny any liability to Plaintiffs and to the Settlement Class.