Class Eligibility

Class Members of the lacrosse helmet settlement include: “All persons throughout the United States who purchased a new Cascade R lacrosse helmet between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014, and who did not resell it.”

The court has also certified two subclasses: a Retrofit Sub-Class and a Non-Retrofit Sub-Class (see below for definitions):

Retrofit Sub-Class: includes Class Members who have registered with PLG and had the retrofit performed by PLG pursuant to the R-M Retrofit Program by the settlement’s final approval date.

Non-Retrofit Sub-Class: includes Class Members who did not have the retrofit performed by PLG pursuant to the R-M Retrofit Program by the settlement’s final approval date.

Estimated Amount

$10 t0 $35 vouchers

Proof of Purchase

Serial #

Case Name

Lindsay Held and Matthew Hemberger, et al. v. Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.,
Case No. 3:14-cv-01842-WIG,
District Court for the District of Connecticut

Case Summary

the lawsuit claims that Lacrosse Group engaged in misrepresentation asserting that Cascade R lacrosse helmets were compliant with standards established by the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE).

The NOCSAE determined that the helmets failed to meet the standard. The plaintiffs indicated that had they known that the helmets were not compliant they would have not purchased the safety gear

The manufacturer denies the allegations but is agreeing to settle to avoid a lengthy trial

Settlement Pool

N/A

Deadline

12/31/2016

Contact


Held v. PLG
c/o Heffler Claims Group
P.O. Box 58340
Philadelphia, PA 19102-8340

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *