Class Eligibility

All Persons who own or owned, or lease or leased, a residence or other structure located in the United States containing a Toilet Connector, or who otherwise suffer or have suffered Property Damage from the failure of a Coupling Nut on a Toilet Connector.

Estimated Amount

For eligible claims submitted within two years of final approval of the Settlement, Settlement Class Members can receive a cash payment of $4 for each DuraPro™ Toilet Connector (up to 5 Toilet Connectors per residence or other structure) that they replace. The maximum cash payment for replacement of Toilet Connectors is $20.

For eligible claims, Settlement Class Members can recover up to 30% of documented costs of repairs for Property Damage caused by the failure of a plastic Coupling Nut on a DuraPro™ Toilet Connector, with a minimum recovery of $4.

Proof of Purchase


Case Name

Jacqueline D. Ajose, et al. v. Interline Brands Inc.,
Case No. 14-CV-01707
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

Case Summary

The lawsuit claims that Interline:

  • Imported, manufactured, designed, distributed and sold DuraPro™ Toilet Connectors with defective plastic Coupling Nuts;
  • Knew of the defective condition of the Coupling Nuts for years before the product was redesigned or replaced;
  • Failed to provide, or provided inadequate, installation instructions; and
  • Failed to provide warnings to prevent failure of the Coupling Nuts.

The lawsuit claims that Interline’s actions led to damage resulting from the failure of the Coupling Nuts on the DuraPro™ Toilet Connectors. The lawsuit asks for money to be paid to people and entities that possess DuraPro™ Toilet Connectors with plastic Coupling Nuts but need to replace them due to their alleged defects, and to people and entities that suffered and/or paid to repair property damage as a result of the failure of a Coupling Nut on a DuraPro™ Toilet Connector.

Interline denies all the claims and allegations in the lawsuit. Interline maintains that the plastic Coupling Nuts on its DuraPro™ Toilet Connectors are not defective in any respect and any failures are the result of other factors (such as improper installation, misuse, or product lifespan).

Settlement Pool





Ajose v. Interline Claims Administrator
c/o Epiq
P.O. Box 2876
Portland, OR 97208-2876

3 responses to “DuraPro Toilet Connector Class Action Settlement”

  1. JOAN BURKE says:

    yes I had problems with this hardware of DursPro Toilet connector…
    it had to be replaced..

    ADMIN – Hi Joan,

    If you meet class eligibility by all means file a claim.

  2. Leigh Steel says:

    We had extensive damage to our home (a six figure claim) as a result of this connector breaking while on a cruise. Insurance covered all but our deductible. Is it worth me joining to recover 30% of deductible which was $2500. Would it apply to a deductible? Also, should I let my insurance co know about this so they can recoup damages?

    ADMIN – Hi Leigh,

    This question can be best handled by class counsel. Give them a call.

  3. Robert H. Ells says:

    I filed a written claim on 8/28/2018 for $1,975.96 in damage caused by the break in the Dura Pro Connector. I have not heard anything since I filed this claim. Can you tell me the status of the reimbursement for my damages and the expected date of payment? The incident happened on 6/25/2018 at our home at 653 Canyon Road in Santa Fe, NM. Thanks for your response.

    ADMIN – Hi Robert,

    I can’t. Please reach out to the class action administrator.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *