Class Eligibility

Members of the class include all persons and entities who purchased wire harness products in the United States directly from one of the defendants between Jan. 1, 2000 and Dec. 13, 2016.

The settlement identifies specific classes for each of the five settling defendants. For Members of the Chiyoda and Fujikura settlement Classes must have made their purchases between Jan. 1, 2000 and May 5, 2014.The members of the Leoni, Sumimoto and Yazaki Classes made their purchases between Jan. 1, 2000 and Dec. 13, 2016.

The Fujikura settlement Class will exclude all persons and entities who commenced an action against Fujikura prior to the execution date included in the MDL litigation.

Estimated Amount


Proof of Purchase


Case Name

n re: Wire Harness Cases and In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation,
Case No. 12-md-02311,
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

Case Summary

This settlement is a consolidated settlement resolving accusations that the manufacturers conspired to artificially raise prices of electric wire harnesses in violation of antitrust laws

Settlement Pool





Wire Harness Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
c/o Epiq Systems Inc.
P.O. Box 5110
Portland, OR 97208-5110

One response to “Wire Harness Direct Purchaser Class Action Settlement”

  1. Tim says:

    Yeah , right I was forced to buy one from a dealer, and still need another that re does my truck undriveable, but since I didn’t buy factory direct I am excluded. The middle man gets paid twice at my expense

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *