Class Eligibility

The Settlements include all persons or entities (but excluding federal and state government entities and Defendants, their officers, directors, and employees, as well as Defendants’ parents, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates) that purchased aftermarket Parking Heaters in the United States, its territories or possessions, directly from any Defendant (Webasto or Espar), or from any of their parents, predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, or affiliates, at any time during the period from and including October 1, 2007 up to and including December 31, 2012..

Estimated Amount


Proof of Purchase


Case Name

In re: Parking Heaters Antitrust Litigation,
Case No. 1:15-mc-00940-DLI-JO
District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Case Summary

The lawsuit alleges that Webasto and Espar participated in an unlawful conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain, and/or stabilize the price of aftermarket Parking Heaters at artificially high levels in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1). Webasto and Espar have each agreed to settle the claims in the case.

Settlement Pool





Parking Heaters Settlement Administrator
c/o Epiq
P.O. Box 3560
Portland, OR 97208-3560

One response to “Webasto Commercial Car Parking Heater Class Action Settlement”

  1. Nora Hammerschmidt says:

    Forgot the price paid.

    ADMIN – Hi Nora,

    Enter an approximation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *